Recently, I have become aware of two situations where managers have become hostages to toxic employees. They are not being held at gunpoint by a criminal trying to negotiate an escape. However, the angst of the situation is similar. One is a female assistant manager for a big-box retailer. She does not work well with others and is actively working to undermine another manager. Not a team player, she creates unnecessary drama. My colleague, Stan, would call her a termite. Someone who destroys the foundation of the company. The other is a subcontractor with poor work habits who delivers an inconsistent product. Both have remained in position because management, facing a difficult labor market, has decided to live with these troublesome people, hoping to avoid the cost of losing them. However, one manager chose to act and found that his fears were unwarranted.
During my corporate career, workers were abundant, so the fear of being understaffed was not a consideration. At that time, the concern for turnover and overstaffing was our focus. Even so, I observed managers fail to discipline employees properly because they delivered outstanding revenue and profit performance. Those producers survived until their financial performance fell below standard. In the meantime, their peers complained about favoritism and unfair treatment by management. It was very frustrating to be a part of those teams. Overall morale suffered because management was held hostage by a flawed subordinate who happened to produce above-average financial results.
Today, we face a different, more difficult labor market. Baby Boomers are retiring, and fewer younger workers are available to replace them. Employers are finding it more challenging to achieve optimal staffing levels. Some managers overlook employee performance issues to minimize the risk of being short-staffed. That was the concern of my client. He was willing to put up with the poor performance of one sub-contractor to ensure that he completed his projects on time.
Nevertheless, I advised him to deal with the performance issue. I informed my client that the situation was sure to worsen. Eventually, he reached his limit when the cost of repairing the subcontractor’s shoddy work became unbearable. With a little bit of effort, he was able to find a suitable replacement. He refused to be a hostage.
It is not uncommon for managers to overestimate the cost of maintaining employee discipline and underestimate the benefit. Sometimes, it is easier to look the other way. They rationalize their decision to minimize the performance issues or ignore them entirely. Avoidance is a big mistake. The rest of the team is closely watching. They view the manager’s lack of action as favoritism and poor leadership. The team’s overall performance eventually suffers, and good employees leave for other jobs. The manager’s failure to deal with performance issues creates more significant problems with greater consequences.
So, what is one to do? First, don’t become a hostage to your employees! Enforce policy uniformly across the workforce. Don’t give a pass to employees who generate stellar results in some areas but fall short in others. Consistently enforced standards and appropriate disciplinary measures will go a long way toward creating a healthy, high-performance culture. This approach to discipline will help reduce turnover and attract better-quality employees.
Another viable strategy is to maintain an ongoing recruiting program. You may not need to step up the actual hiring, but you will know where to go to find good employees when you need them.
The two examples I presented at the beginning of this article make an interesting case study. One client decided to face the performance issue head-on, resulting in the termination of the sub-contractor in question. My client replaced the subcontractor with a more appropriate hire. The client refused to be held hostage. The other situation has deteriorated further as the management refuses to take corrective action.
Maintaining organizational discipline is not optional. Success requires vigilant maintenance of systems, processes, and procedures. Maintaining discipline may be more difficult in trying times, but it is of greater importance. The stakes are higher, as is the risk of failure. Good employees will gravitate to the best employers, so become the preferred employer in your market. Build a healthy culture of success by enforcing policy in a consistent, firm, fair, and friendly manner. It is the best way I know to ensure long-term success.
Thank you for visiting our blog.
Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners
I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox. Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.
Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read. Your input is very important to me, so please leave a comment.