New Century Dynamics Executive Search
Recently, I have become aware of two situations where managers have become hostages to toxic employees. They are not being held at gunpoint by a criminal trying to negotiate an escape. However, the angst of the situation is similar. One is a female assistant manager for a big-box retailer. She does not work well with others and is actively working to undermine another manager. Not a team player, she creates unnecessary drama. My colleague, Stan, would call her a termite. Someone who destroys the foundation of the company. The other is a subcontractor with poor work habits who delivers an inconsistent product. Both have remained in position because management, facing a difficult labor market, has decided to live with these troublesome people, hoping to avoid the cost of losing them. However, one manager chose to act and found that his fears were unwarranted.
During my corporate career, workers were abundant, so the fear of being understaffed was not a consideration. At that time, the concern for turnover and overstaffing was our focus. Even so, I observed managers fail to discipline employees properly because they delivered outstanding revenue and profit performance. Those producers survived until their financial performance fell below standard. In the meantime, their peers complained about favoritism and unfair treatment by management. It was very frustrating to be a part of those teams. Overall morale suffered because management was held hostage by a flawed subordinate who happened to produce above-average financial results.
Today, we face a different, more difficult labor market. Baby Boomers are retiring, and fewer younger workers are available to replace them. Employers are finding it more challenging to achieve optimal staffing levels. Some managers overlook employee performance issues to minimize the risk of being short-staffed. That was the concern of my client. He was willing to put up with the poor performance of one sub-contractor to ensure that he completed his projects on time.
Nevertheless, I advised him to deal with the performance issue. I informed my client that the situation was sure to worsen. Eventually, he reached his limit when the cost of repairing the subcontractor’s shoddy work became unbearable. With a little bit of effort, he was able to find a suitable replacement. He refused to be a hostage.
It is not uncommon for managers to overestimate the cost of maintaining employee discipline and underestimate the benefit. Sometimes, it is easier to look the other way. They rationalize their decision to minimize the performance issues or ignore them entirely. Avoidance is a big mistake. The rest of the team is closely watching. They view the manager’s lack of action as favoritism and poor leadership. The team’s overall performance eventually suffers, and good employees leave for other jobs. The manager’s failure to deal with performance issues creates more significant problems with greater consequences.
So, what is one to do? First, don’t become a hostage to your employees! Enforce policy uniformly across the workforce. Don’t give a pass to employees who generate stellar results in some areas but fall short in others. Consistently enforced standards and appropriate disciplinary measures will go a long way toward creating a healthy, high-performance culture. This approach to discipline will help reduce turnover and attract better-quality employees.
Another viable strategy is to maintain an ongoing recruiting program. You may not need to step up the actual hiring, but you will know where to go to find good employees when you need them.
The two examples I presented at the beginning of this article make an interesting case study. One client decided to face the performance issue head-on, resulting in the termination of the sub-contractor in question. My client replaced the subcontractor with a more appropriate hire. The client refused to be held hostage. The other situation has deteriorated further as the management refuses to take corrective action.
Maintaining organizational discipline is not optional. Success requires vigilant maintenance of systems, processes, and procedures. Maintaining discipline may be more difficult in trying times, but it is of greater importance. The stakes are higher, as is the risk of failure. Good employees will gravitate to the best employers, so become the preferred employer in your market. Build a healthy culture of success by enforcing policy in a consistent, firm, fair, and friendly manner. It is the best way I know to ensure long-term success.
Thank you for visiting our blog.
Jim Weber – Managing Partner, ITB Partners
I hope you enjoyed our point of view and would like to receive regular posts directly to your email inbox. Toward this end, put your contact information on my mailing list.
Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read. Your input is very important to me, so please leave a comment.
A well-functioning company is a company in which different teams and team members all easily collaborate with one another. And when that kind of successful teamwork happens, it can look so easy and organic, one might even assume that things just fell into place naturally, with no effort. But while good collaboration looks effortless, often it only comes about through multiple efforts on multiple levels. As a business owner or manager, you need to acquire the leadership skills that will allow you to facilitate that kind of teamwork. Here are some guidelines for how to master these skills and get your company running like a well-oiled machine.
If we learned anything from the last two years, it is that we need to adapt to how and where we work. We learned that the world is becoming increasingly more home-centered as work becomes a virtual instead of a physical environment.
This past Friday, I delivered a presentation at the January 2022 meeting of ITB Partners. The theme of the topic was about building one’s independent consulting practice by leveraging your time. One of the participants was curious about how many members were following this strategy. He was interested in learning how the broader membership viewed this issue. Are we in a bubble? Are we victims of Groupthink? Not only did I think that was an excellent question, but I also promised to survey our wider membership to determine if their activities align with my recommendations. This exchange reminded me of similar situations I had encountered during my corporate career.
This week I had an interesting conversation with a senior executive recently released from a major brand. Let’s call him John. He has the benefit of an Outplacement Program, which will be helpful as he has not had to look for a new job in a very long time. He reconnected with me to discuss his situation and to seek my help. John was interested in my opinion of his goals relative to the current market for his skill set.
I work with many startups and emerging brands. They have become the core of my business. It gives me great satisfaction in helping them with their recruiting needs. When my colleagues and I created ITB Partners, our strategy was to focus on this sector. Companies in this phase of their life cycle face decisions that carry significant risk. One or two bad choices can sink an otherwise viable company, even if they have proof of concept. We believed we could help emerging companies achieve success by avoiding business-killing mistakes. Recruiting new employees is one of those high-risk activities.
